As cells coalesced into organisms, they built new ``unnatural'' and internally controlled environments to cope even more successfully with the entropy increasing properties of the external world. The useful suggestion of Professor David Hawkins which considers culture as a third stage in biological evolution fits quite beautifully then with our suggestion that science has provided us with a rather successful technique for building protective artificial environments. One wonders about its applicability to people. Will advances in human sciences help us build social structures and governments which will enable us to cope with people as effectively as the primitive combination of protein and nucleic acid built a structure of molecules which enabled it to adapt to a sea of molecular interaction? The answer is of course yes. For the family is the simplest example of just such a unit, composed of people, which gives us both some immunity from, and a way of dealing with, other people. Social invention did not have to await social theory any more than use of the warmth of a fire had to await Lavoisier or the buoyant protection of a boat the formulations of Archimedes. But it has been during the last two centuries, during the scientific revolution, that our independence from the physical environment has made the most rapid strides. We have ample light when the sun sets; the temperature of our homes is independent of the seasons; we fly through the air, although gravity pulls us down; the range of our voice ignores distance. At what stage are social sciences then? Is the future of psychology akin to the rich future of physics at the time of Newton? There is a haunting resemblance between the notion of cause in Copernicus and in Freud. And it is certainly no slight to either of them to compare both their achievements and their impact.